Talk:4chan
From Wikipedia, a free encyclopedia written in simple English for easy reading.
[edit] Should a 4chan article exist?
This article should exist because it is about a website pioneering anonymous imageboard discussion (based on 2ch and 2chan) in the West, without the need for names or registration. It has a large article on normal wikipedia, I don't see reason why one shouldn't be on here in a simpler form for those who want to learn, ie Japanese 2chan users learning about their Western counterpart in simple english. 81.110.124.168 16:02, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
These are all good and valid points. 4chan, mostly /b/, is definitely big enough of a site to have an entry.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/4chan <- REASON ENOUGH!? 213.66.76.169 19:17, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
Hi I can't understand what this 4chan is being, so please simple the 4chan in wikipedia to the simple wikipedia please.
- An administrator has deleted 4chan and protected it from being re-created. That means NO ARTICLE. If you want to know about 4chan, go to the english wikipedia. Thank you. PullToOpen Talk 19:55, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
- Shouldn't every Wikipedia article ideally have a Simple article? Ashibaka 23:01, 26 November 2006 (UTC)