Wikipedia talk:Администратор
Де ла Википедия ын лимба молдовеняскэ
Ачастэ паӂинэ а фост пропусэ пентру штерӂере. Мотивул: the page has to be moved to Wikipedia talk:Администратор which must be deleted first |
Pill 08:56, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Votes
Remember folks, votes may only be placed by active users, and must be placed by the deadline. Sorry to those who missed the deadline. Your consolation prize is: a cookie! Yay! --Node ue 02:46, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
HAHAHAHA!!! Guys Check the history of the page; Node said he erased all those opposed to him because one day went by without one single person opposing him, yet the history shows that in 24 hours 3 people accepted him (one is blocked) and 4 people opposed him. Констэнцияну 20:41, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] What is this?!
Kindergarten play?!...
- Since when can rules change during the vote?
- One-day vote? Get real, votes last about a week, at least in grown-ups' world.
- What does "no oppose" mean? I voted against, and I do have more than three edits in the article namespace.
- The votes were repeatedly vandalized in the crudest ways.
- Closing a nomination by completely deleting the votes?
Node, take your toys and play somewhere else. The community has decided to close this project. There is no need for administrators. --AdiJapan 05:18, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
- The community here consists of myself, User:Moldova, and User:Varul lui Bonaparte, il cunosti. NOne of us voted to close thsi Wikipedia.
- Rules can't change during the vote -- Bonaparte changed them, after the 1-day period was over, and that's why you didn't see it. --Node ue 07:19, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
- Oh, and, you don't have more than 3 contribs to the main namespace in the last month, see: http://mo.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/AdiJapan in fact you have 0 --`Node ue 07:25, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
-
- The "last month" rule was not there when I voted. It was not there when you (by some authority that I fail to understand) decided on the voting rules either. AdiJapan 08:11, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- Yes, but the "active users" rule was, it simply didn't specify a definition for "active". If you want the "official" Wikimedia one, check the Wikipedia Statistics site, which does NOT list you as a currently-active user here. Pavel, in a similar vein, decided the rules at Wikipedia:Alegeri, and when I tried to make them more neutral, I was reverted like a common vandal. --Node ue 08:16, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
- Node you really make me laugh. I remember that one time we did have a similar one day vote related to this wiki, and you were the first to jump and say how it was not fair, blah blah blah. I see you apply double standards whenever it suits you, but honestly buddy, you really think that anyone is going to take this thing seriously. Nobody made you in charge to place those rules in the first place so sorry to brake it to you but reality is that this vote is as valid as a toilet piece of paper. Констэнцияну 20:34, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
[edit] Bonaparte is inelligible
...because he has WAAAAY fewer than 100 edits in the article namespace. --Node ue 07:25, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
- How about nominees Moldova and Varul? You seem to apply rules only where they work in your advantage. AdiJapan 08:11, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
-
- Hey, I said that applied to SYsops, not Bureaucrats. --Node ue 08:14, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- Listen to yourself, twisting every trace of logic... So becoming a beaurocrat is easier than becoming a sysop. What's next? --AdiJapan 10:45, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- Bureaucrats tend to be moire distant. And what's wrong with that, anyways? And why do you care, mister I'-don't-edit-the-article-namespace-here? --Node ue 10:48, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
- This wiki seems to be doomed anyway, so who cares? --Братът на Бонапарт, го знате? 10:46, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Perhaps not -- it appears a flood of friends has swooped in to save us at the eleventh hour. I counted 9 oppose (versus 17 support) so far. Hopefully, by tomorrow there will be more. --Node ue 10:48, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Is this a joke? Node do you actually believe that this vote will be taken seriously? And like Adi, I cannot but help that you have twisted this thing to suit only yourself and your interests. On top of that I only count 3 votes, all being for support but Varul lui Bonaparte is being blocked. Another thing and perhaps the most important thing - the future of this wikipedia is still being discussed and is currently proposed to be erased so sorry Node - I suggest you try making other Wikipedias, I suggest: the American language wikipedia. Констэнцияну 20:26, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- HAHAHAH!!!! I WIN!!!!!! That's what you get for messing with MOLDOVA!!! Bi-yautche! --Node ue 05:10, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- Vorbeste pe romana porc ule ce esti, ca te ia mama draculyi imediat! --Fratele lui Bonaparte, il cunosti? 05:11, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
-
[edit] Adi ce pierzi timpul cu acest nemernic?
E evident că acest vot nu are nici o consecinţă deoarece nu a fost organizat de administratorul proiectului (Bogdan), şi proiectul se va inchide curând. Vania tractoristu 13:39, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
- Apparently you haven't been around Wikipedia very long. Votes, of any kind, can be organized by any user. --Node ue 01:27, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
-
- Da şi nu. Dacă deja există un oarecare mecanism stabilit de către comunitate pentru a conduce alegeri pentru administratori, atunci un utlizator poate să deschidă o instanţă specifică de vot. Însă tu nu poţi stabili condiţiile pentru acest vot cât un astfel de mecanism nu a fost implementat doearece tu nu deţii această autoritate. Doar Bogdan care este administratorul curent ar putea stabili acest proces. Vania tractoristu 02:22, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Corect. Apropo, de ce instrucţiunile de vot sînt scrise în engleză? AdiJapan 02:48, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- Deoarece el nu cunoaşte româna. El probabil are abilitatea să scrie ceva simplu utilizând unele dicţionare, însă aceasta ar dura prea mult, şi el consideră că e mai logic să le scrie în engleză. Aceasta doar demonstrează faptul că el nu ar fi un admnistrator adecvat, cum ar interacţiona cu alţi "moldoveni"? Vania tractoristu 03:01, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
-
- That's irrelevant. You are the weakest link. Goodbye. --Node ue 05:10, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
-
- Pentru ca nodu nu vorbeste decat, si subliniez, decat engleza....si aia cu accent rusesc :) --Fratele lui Bonaparte, il cunosti? 05:06, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- Cum e irelevant? Câţi moldoveni crezi tu că cunosc engleza mai bine decât limba lor natală? De ce ar trebui ei să comunice cu administratorul acestei pagini într-o altă limbă decât moldveneasca/româna? Eu nu spun că tu nu poţi să contribui, însă îmi pare ridicol că ceri să fii administrator. Vania tractoristu 15:59, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- I SAID YOU ARE THE WEAKEST LINK! GOODBYE TRACTORIST! --Node ue 01:01, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
- :) Şi tu crezi că cineva va alege un sugar ca tine la o oarecare poziţie importantă? Vania tractoristu 02:10, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- "oarecare" is a Romanian word. In Moldova it's spelt "bkjasdfiaioawer". Please don't write in Romanian here, write Moldovan. Every time you write Romanian on the Moldovan wikipedia, god kills a kitten. --Node ue 04:04, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Dacă atît de tare iubeşti moldoveneasca, de ce scrii în engleză? Eu prefer să utilizez moldoveneasca literară, înse se pare că cunoştinţa ta a limbii e limitată la "bîrcîeşte". That is why all you can do is use an autmoated transliteration tool and copy articles from Ro. Vania tractoristu 12:56, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- If I used real Moldovan, you would be blinded by its sheer amazing-ness. If you beg me, I might give you a word or two, but don't tell me I didn't warn you. --Node ue 15:46, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
- După ce am vorbit această limbă toată viaţa mea, tu ai să-mi arăţi versiunea ei corectă? Pentru tine chiar să scrii o propoziţie corectă prezintă un obstacol formidabil. Vania tractoristu 16:04, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
- If I used real Moldovan, you would be blinded by its sheer amazing-ness. If you beg me, I might give you a word or two, but don't tell me I didn't warn you. --Node ue 15:46, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Silly, that's not Moldovan, that's Mroldrovran. Real Moldovan glows with a heavenly light, bright enough to blind you! --Node ue 16:21, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Comportamentul tău doar confirmă opinia majorităţii că tu eşti un copilandru care are prea mult timp liber. Vania tractoristu 16:59, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Vorbeste englezeste sau vei fi blocat pentru insulta si nerespectarea regulilor pe aceasta wikipedie! --Node ue 17:58, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
[edit] Ok, it's over. This time.
According to the rules he himself chose, Node_ue lost these elections. Obviously, he's trying to falsify the results (helped by some well-intentioned Russian), but hopefully he won't be able to do it. Dpotop 13:07, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Template:Rpa